The problem with a weak brand, at every level - be it personal, corporate, social, country, region, religion - is that it yearns to get the limelight of stronger brands in the space (to make its brand stronger) but is often fearful and unsure of what the result would be. Most often than not, the weaker brand is disappointed with the result of the brand enhancement exercise as the coverage of a weak bran is normally stereotyped in the same niche in which it exists. How to get out of that vicious cycle is the inherent dilemma of weak brands. Simply put, brand repositioning (on the way up!) is extremely tough.
Just to elaborate the point, let's look at a few examples; Misbah vs Afridi in cricket (Misbah is one of the most consistent performers and successful captains in the game today but never gets a decent hearing from the media as opposed to the highly volatile - to put it mildly - Afridi who dominates the local media). The same goes for the branding biases of Pakistan vs India, Samsung vs Apple, non-whites vs whites, McDonald vs Burger King, Sadequain vs MF Hussain, 'Urdu-medium' vs 'English medium', CBM vs IBA, etc, etc ..... I think you get the point.
In this backdrop, whenever Pakistan's name is mentioned at the international level on the 'softer image' side (what ever this term means!), Pakistanis get excited, they read the story and then often get disappointed. Even these stories normally don't reflect the reality on the ground and somehow connect them to the post 9/11 stereotyped image of the country (I don't need to elaborate what that image is ...... all of us have had an overdose of that).
The whole point of this preamble was to put a disclaimer before posting this article. I think the article is shallow on so many different levels - be it stereotyping it with terrorism (how many of you have seen a serious OBL art work?), not mentioning that artists in every part of the world in every era are influenced by things around them, art in meant to be political, there are so many other topics being addressed/covered too, art has not received international attention due to 9/11 but rather that there has been a resurgence in arts in the past decade across all emerging markets as their economies and societies have developed, that Pakistan creative centres gained momentum in the past 15 years after the dark ages of Zia, etc etc (see bottom part of A Proud Milestone for Pakistan & Asian Art . But then we are used to CNNs/Bloombergs of this world doing superficial reporting in the spirit of 'who cares about the details'.
I am still sharing this article in the spirit of "badnaam agar hoNge to kya naam na hoga" (Shefta).
Enjoy (or not) !
Artwallaa
Bin Laden’s Parrots Blood Fuel Boom in Pakistan Artists
By Faseeh Mangi - Aug 26, 2013
Source Bloomberg
Osama bin Laden stares out at an army of shadowy figures. Each carries a machine gun and has the head of a parrot.
The roof of the Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art in New York is covered with what looks like dried blood. Close up, the work shows shrubbery and bird feathers. A patriotic picture of the U.S. flag isn’t all it seems. Each of the stars and stripes is made up of tiny Urdu verses asking for forgiveness and mercy from God.
Just to elaborate the point, let's look at a few examples; Misbah vs Afridi in cricket (Misbah is one of the most consistent performers and successful captains in the game today but never gets a decent hearing from the media as opposed to the highly volatile - to put it mildly - Afridi who dominates the local media). The same goes for the branding biases of Pakistan vs India, Samsung vs Apple, non-whites vs whites, McDonald vs Burger King, Sadequain vs MF Hussain, 'Urdu-medium' vs 'English medium', CBM vs IBA, etc, etc ..... I think you get the point.
In this backdrop, whenever Pakistan's name is mentioned at the international level on the 'softer image' side (what ever this term means!), Pakistanis get excited, they read the story and then often get disappointed. Even these stories normally don't reflect the reality on the ground and somehow connect them to the post 9/11 stereotyped image of the country (I don't need to elaborate what that image is ...... all of us have had an overdose of that).
The whole point of this preamble was to put a disclaimer before posting this article. I think the article is shallow on so many different levels - be it stereotyping it with terrorism (how many of you have seen a serious OBL art work?), not mentioning that artists in every part of the world in every era are influenced by things around them, art in meant to be political, there are so many other topics being addressed/covered too, art has not received international attention due to 9/11 but rather that there has been a resurgence in arts in the past decade across all emerging markets as their economies and societies have developed, that Pakistan creative centres gained momentum in the past 15 years after the dark ages of Zia, etc etc (see bottom part of A Proud Milestone for Pakistan & Asian Art . But then we are used to CNNs/Bloombergs of this world doing superficial reporting in the spirit of 'who cares about the details'.
I am still sharing this article in the spirit of "badnaam agar hoNge to kya naam na hoga" (Shefta).
Enjoy (or not) !
Artwallaa
Bin Laden’s Parrots Blood Fuel Boom in Pakistan Artists
By Faseeh Mangi - Aug 26, 2013
Source Bloomberg
Osama bin Laden stares out at an army of shadowy figures. Each carries a machine gun and has the head of a parrot.
The roof of the Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art in New York is covered with what looks like dried blood. Close up, the work shows shrubbery and bird feathers. A patriotic picture of the U.S. flag isn’t all it seems. Each of the stars and stripes is made up of tiny Urdu verses asking for forgiveness and mercy from God.
Thanks for sharing this classic post. keep sharing such pretty post like this. This kind of post is very informative.
ReplyDeleteArt Marketing